Subscribe to Jane Austen’s Regency World magazine to keep up to date with all that is happening in the world of Jane Austen and the Georgian and Regency eras.

The magazine is published six times a year in Bath, England, and is mailed to fans of Jane Austen and the Georgian/Regency era worldwide.

‘Austen’ Rice portrait: new controversy

Rice portrait

The long-running debate about the authenticity of the so-called Rice portrait, believed by some to be of a teenage Jane Austen, sprung to life again at the weekend.

According to the Daily Mail, a new digital analysis of the painting has uncovered writing in one corner that might link it to Jane Austen.

The painting is owned by the Rice family, direct descendants of one of Jane’s brothers. It came to light in the late 19th century and the family say it was composed while the Austens were visiting Jane’s great uncle Francis in Kent in 1789, when the girl was 13.

The controversy comes hot on the heels of the suggestion by the academic Dr Paula Byrne that a portrait in her possession is of Jane Austen.

The authenticity of the Rice portrait has long been disputed, and it was dismissed by the National Portrait Gallery many years ago – mainly because the style of the girl’s dress dates the painting to the 1800s, when Jane Austen would have been in her twenties.

More information from the Rice family can be found here.

What do you think? Post a comment and let us know your thoughts!

One Response to ‘Austen’ Rice portrait: new controversy

  • It is her! The thing about the dress style being wrong is absolutely ridiculous. I love Dierdre LeFaye, but I believe we have to admit she was wrong on this one. Even before I heard about this controversy, I grew up seeing portraits from the 1790’s of young women dressed in this style.

    I found the Jane Austen Rice Portrait website very interesting, and they have actual pictorial evidence of what I’m suggesting regarding her clothing.

    Plus, the features very strongly resemble James Stanier-Clarke’s portrait, and the drawing of Mary Queen of Scots, which is thought to be based on Jane’s own features, as she was very fond of Mary. Both of those drawings have the same full, pinched mouth, and the same high, broad cheekbones.

    Just my two pence! 😉

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow JARW